Monday, May 30, 2011

Monday Reruns: Seeking Balance on the Highest Court

(original post-date: May 26, 2010)

Following Justice John Paul Stevens’ retirement announcement and Obama’s subsequent nomination of Elena Kagan to fill Stevens’ seat, there’s been a lot of buzz about “who’s what” on the Supreme Court.

Per the opinion of some, New York already is over-represented. Per the opinion of others, the potential lack of a Protestant seems cause for alarm.

Neither of those possibilities bothers me. New York happens to be incredibly well-populated, and it always has been. So, statistically, it makes a certain amount of sense that it would be home to a disproportionate number of well-educated, well-qualified professionals.

As for the religious stuff, I’m not convinced that a person’s affiliation with a particular dogma adequately defines him or her. There are too many examples of elected officials whose “walk” is at odds with their “talk.” And then there are those on the other end of the spectrum – those who may attend mass a few times a week and still genuinely honor the separation of church and state.

So, since those particular “identifiers” don’t really concern me, I decided to raise my own question regarding the matters of who and what. I decided to throw another demographic query into the mix. What is the astrological breakout of the current Supreme Court, and how does nominee Elena Kagan fit in?

Go ahead and laugh at my question, but here’s the deal: I’m a Libra. My sign is the sign of the scales. And oh no, honey, I’m not talking about the scales you dread standing on after a weekend that included two consecutive all-you-can-eat buffets. I’m talking about the scales of JUSTICE! Mine is the sign of an individual who weighs, balances, and pursues fairness.

Wouldn’t it be cool if we had a few Libras on the Supreme Court?

Let’s check it out…

Okay, first: Stevens – the guy who’s retiring – was born on April 20th. That’s the first day of Taurus (an EARTH sign; the sign of the bull).

Elena Kagan, nominated to replace him, was born on April 28th. Also a Taurus. And while I am absolutely sure that Obama did not consider this fact when planning to fill Stevens’ seat, I think it’s fabulously coincidental.

(I also relate to it. In fact, if you saw an accounting of the men I’ve invited into my boudoir over the course of my adulthood, you’d see that I’ve often replaced a Taurus with a Taurus. I don’t know what it is about the bull, but I always fall for it.)

Oh, sorry, this really isn’t about me…

Okay, so the rest of the court:

John Roberts was born on January 27th, making him an Aquarius (like Libra and Gemini, an AIR sign.)

Samuel Alito’s birthday is April 1st. What? April Fool’s Day? Doesn’t that just seem so wrong in this context? Anyway, Alito’s foolish birthday makes him an Aries, which is a FIRE sign.

Two other fires are on the bench: Anthony Kennedy was born on July 23rd, the first day of Leo. And Stephen Breyer, also a Leo, was born on August 15th .

The rest are WATER signs.

Two Cancers: (Clarence Thomas – June 23rd, and Sonia Sotomayor – June 25th).

Two Pisces: (Antonin Scalia – March 11th, and Ruth Bader Ginsberg – March 15th).

That’s four WATERs, three FIREs, one AIR, and one EARTH.

And not a single goddamn Libra among them.

Frankly, I’m offended.

And here’s another thing: With a near majority of justices in WATER, I can’t help but consider a certain homonymic phrase: Row versus wade.

We’ll just have to see what happens.


Lisa Ricard Claro said...

Haha! This is great! The last line is perfect, like a cherry on top of an especially yummy dessert. :) I, too, am a Libra (Oct 17), and my constant weighing and balancing drives my family nuts sometimes. My husband (born April 25, making him a Taurus...LOL...coincidence? I think not) is used to it after all these years and lets me do what I must to ensure personal sanity for both of us.

Sioux said...

I agree with Lisa. The lines about the justices and their signs...$9.95. The lines about your personal experience...$27.50. The last line...priceless!

Anonymous said...

Excellent summary - especially your apparent passion for the bull! But hey, no Scorpio in the Supreme Court? Shame!Perhaps just as well... (Loyal and passionate on the one hand, jealous and obsessive on the other.) I love this post, though your politics are of course foreign to me :-)Oh, I am married to a Piscean by the way - romantic and trustworthy!

Jules said...

I think I remember laughing the first time I read this and here I am doing it again! :)
Jules @ Trying To Get Over The Rainbow

Amy said...

I loved this post. It's very interesting to see the breakdown of astrological signs. I don't follow it all too closely --horoscopes that is--but do believe the planets play some part in forming our personalities.

Row vs Wade: I'm still chuckling.

P.S As a saggitarius with a libra rising, I think it's a good thing that I'm not a justice. I argue all sides fairly and yet with plenty of fire and rarely give in easily. Yikes!

Linda Medrano said...

My husband is a Taurus. He's ultra liberal and very funny for a retired military guy and a military contractor. He's also the only defense contractor I know who is Navajo Indian. He'd make a good Supreme. I would not. But I'd make a great Empress of all she surveys.